Showing posts with label coronary heart disease. Show all posts
Showing posts with label coronary heart disease. Show all posts

Thursday, November 20, 2008

Does Avapro help patients with heart failure?

Irbesartan in Patients with Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction
Original source: New England Journal of Medicine Volume 359, Number 23
Authors: Barry M. Massie, M.D. (corresponding author), Peter E. Carson, M.D., John J. McMurray, M.D., Michel Komajda, M.D., Robert McKelvie, M.D., Michael R. Zile, M.D., Susan Anderson, M.S., Mark Donovan, Ph.D., Erik Iverson, M.S., Christoph Staiger, M.D., Agata Ptaszynska, M.D., for the I-PRESERVE Investigators
Publication date: online: November 11, 2008 print: December 4, 2008
DOI (digital document ID): 10.1056/NEJMoa0805450
Requires subscription? Yes
Publicly-available abstract: Yes

Synopsis:
There is a need to find a way of improving the outcome of patients with heart failure, whose left ventricles still function to some degree. The investigators wanted to know if irbesartan (brand names Avapro, Aprovel, Karvea) might serve that purpose.

Over 4000 patients, over the age of 60, and classified as having varying degrees of heart failure but at least 45% left ventricular evacuation fraction, were studied for just over 4 years. Some were given irbesartan and others were given a placebo. The investigators wanted to know how many of those patients had subsequent cardiovascular events requiring hospitalization, how many died from heart failure or cardiovascular causes, and how many died overall. The numbers of deaths were similar in both groups, though the number of hospitalizations for cardiovascular events were slightly lower in the group receiving the medication.

Because the numbers of deaths and cardiovascular events overall were not significantly different between the two groups, irbesartan is not considered to be effective for this application.

Reliability:
The study size is reasonable, and the subjects were followed for a reasonably-long period of time. Because of the ages of the subjects, the results may not be valid for younger patients.

The researchers are associated with accredited medical institutions in several countries. The article was published in peer-reviewed journal.

The research was sponsored by two pharmaceutical companies, Bristol Meyers Squibb (BMS) and Sanofi-Aventis. BMS and Sanofi-Aventis both manufacture and market Avapro and have a vested financial interest in its use for reasons in addition to the treatment high blood pressure.

Practical Applications:
Irbesartan has not been proven to be effective in preserving heart function among older patients with heart failure, but with preserved left ventricular function.

For further reading:
This is not the first time additional uses for Avapro have been considered. Avapro has also been studied as a drug with which to preserve kidney function in people with Type 2 diabetes. The following article is one of several published following that train of research:
The effect of irbesartan on the development of diabetic nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes.

This synopsis was based on the abstract of the online preprint.

Monday, November 17, 2008

Diabetes and Risk of death from coronary events

Diabetes Mellitus and Mortality after Acute Coronary Syndrome as a First or Recurrent Cardiovascular Event
Original source: PLoS ONE Vol. 3, No. 10
Authors: Richard M. Cubbon, Afroze Abbas, Stephen B. Wheatcroft, Niamh Kilcullen, Raj Das, Christine Morrell, Julian H. Barth, Mark T. Kearney (corresponding author), Alistair S. Hall for the EMMACE-2 investigators
Publication date: 22 October 2008
DOI (digital document ID): 10.1371/journal.pone.0003483
Requires subscription? No
Publicly-available abstract: Yes

Synopsis:
Diabetes has been associated with problems recovering from, and with higher risk of death from, acute coronary syndrome. The investigators were looking to find whether this increased risk was true for all persons with diabetes, or only for those persons with diabetes who already had cardiovascular disease, compared to people without diabetes (with, or without, diagnosed cardiovascular disease). The investigators wondered whether cardiovascular disease is diagnosed earlier in people with diabetes than in the general population, and if that early diagnosis, plus aggressive preventative treatment, reduced the risk of dying from acute coronary syndrome.

For the purposes of the study, "Acute Coronary Syndrome" covered unstable angina or myocardial infarction (heart attack). "Cardiovascular Disease" was devined as myocardial infarction, angina, stroke, peripheral vascular disease, or coronary revascularization (either the heart's circulatory system rerouting itself, or the need for stents, bypasses, or other surgical techniques to open or replace blocked blood vessels). Note that by these definitions, "acute coronary syndrome" is a subset of "cardiovascular disease".

The researchers looked at the data collected in the EMMACE-II observational study in 2003, which tracked just under 2500 patients. The investigators used the patients' previous medical records to split the patients into four groups: those without diabetes or previously-diagnosed cardiovascular disease; those without diabetes, but who had existing cardiovascular disease; those with diabetes but without a history of cardiovascular disease; and those with both diabetes and a history of cardiovascular disease. The data from these four groups were analyzed separately and compared.

The results showed that while patients with diabetes had an overall increased risk of death from acute coronary syndrome, the rates of death of patients with no history of cardiovascular disease were approximately the same, regardless of whether or not they had diabetes.

After adjusting for age and gender, there was still an increased risk of death for patients with diabetes and a history of cardiovascular disease over patients from the other three groups; however, when the results were adjusted for levels of Troponin I -- which was used to indicate how much of the heart muscle had died due to cardiovascular disease, the correlation between mortality and diabetes disappeared. This lack of correlation remained even when the investigators broadened or narrowed the definition of cardiovascular disease used in their analysis.

These findings suggest that the risk of dying from acute coronary syndrome may be related to the degree to which the heart's blood vessels have been blocked, and that the reduced degree of blockage in patients with diabetes, but no history of cardiovascular disease, may be related to aggressive preventative treatment that is not routinely offered to people without diabetes.

Reliability:
The authors are from accredited medical institutions and the research is published in a peer-reviewed journal. The size of the study is large enough to show potential trends and suggest directions for further research. The authors note limitations of the study include the absence of several key risk indicators (such as albuminuria -- protein in the urine -- and obesity) and details of any preventative therapy the patients may have received. They also note that patients with a history of previous cardiovascular disease are less likely to receive prescriptions for preventative drugs (such as statins and ACE inhibitors) than patients being discharged after their first acute coronary event, and because this is counterintuitive to standard practice, understanding the reasons for this difference would also help to quantify the differences in risk.

Practical Applications:
Understanding the true origins of the risks of death from acute coronary syndrome can help our doctors better treat us and help us reduce those risks to the greatest degree possible.

For further reading:
The British Cardiac Society Working Group definition of myocardial infarction: implications for practice -- abstract describing the EMMACE-II study.

This synopsis was based on the entire article.

Monday, October 20, 2008

Metabolic syndrome increases risk of heart disease and diabetes

Metabolic syndrome risk for cardiovascular disease and diabetes in the ARIC study
Authors: C M Ballantyne (correpsonding author), R C Hoogeveen, A M McNeill, G Heiss, M I Schmidt, B B Duncan and J S Pankow
Original source: International Journal of Obesity Volume 32, Supplement 2, pp. S21-S24
Publication date: May, 2008
DOI (digital document ID): doi:10.1038/ijo.2008.31
Requires subscription? Not for this article
Publicly-available abstract: Yes

Synopsis:
The investigators studied over 15,000 middle-aged Americans in four communities for a period of approximately ten years to try to determine the role of metabolic syndrome in the development of cardiovascular (heart and artery) disease and diabetes. The particular study is called Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC).

Metabolic syndrome is diagnosed by the presence of three or more of the following characteristics: waist circumference greater than 40" in men or 35" in women; high triglycerides (over 150 mg/dl); low HDL or "good cholesterol" (less than 40 mg/dl in men or 50 mg/dl in women); high blood pressure (over 130/85 mm Hg); and high fasting glucose levels.

The investigators studied the numbers of those with and without metabolic syndrome to determine how much greater a risk someone with metabolic syndrome has of developing atherosclerosis, heart disease, stroke, or diabetes.
  • ARIC participants who had metabolic syndrome were two to three times more likely to have coronary heart disease than those without, with the highest additional risk in black men and white women.
  • The walls of the carotid arteries of persons with metabolic syndrome were about 5% thicker than those without.
  • The increased risk of stroke for those with metabolic syndrome was an additional 35-40 cases per 10,000 person years.
  • Of those participants with three or more indicators of metabolic syndrome, who did not have diabetes, those with obesity and/or elevated fasting glucose levels had significantly increased risk of developing diabetes.

Reliability:
This is a large study, conducted over a long period of time, and the article was published in a peer-reviewed journal. Both this, and the academic credentials of the authors, result in high levels of confidence in the results.

Further reading:
More information on the design of the ARIC study and publications based on information collected during the study can be found at the ARIC home page.

This synopsis was based on the entire article.