Insulin inhalers don't prevent Type 1 diabetes in children with antibodies

Nasal insulin to prevent type 1 diabetes in children with HLA genotypes and autoantibodies conferring increased risk of disease: a double-blind, randomised controlled trial
Original source: The Lancet, Volume 372, Issue 9651
Authors: Kirsti Näntö-Salonen (corresponding author), Antti Kupila, Satu Simell, Heli Siljander, Tiina Salonsaari, Anne Hekkala, Sari Korhonen, Risto Erkkola, Jukka I Sipilä, Lotta Haavisto, Marja Siltala, Juhani Tuominen, Jari Hakalax, Heikki Hyöty, Jorma Ilonen, Riitta Veijola, Tuula Simell, Mikael Knip, Olli Simell
Publication date: 15 November 2008
DOI (digital document ID): 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61309-4
Requires subscription? Yes
Publicly-available abstract: Yes

Synopsis:
In mice engineered to have risk of Type 1 diabetes, inhaled insulin has been shown to reduce their likelihood of developing diabetes. The authors wanted to know if this would work in humans. They screened a number of infants for a specific gene (the HLA-DQB1 susceptibility allele) linked to increased risk of developing Type 1 diabetes. The siblings of susceptible infants were also screened. Of these, over 11,000 infants and 1500 related siblings consented to having their children's blood screened for diabetes at 3-12 month intervals. [One would presume that for minors, their parents would have been the ones giving consent.] From these, 224 infants and 40 of their siblings (all of whom tested positive for two or more diabetes-specific antibodies) were entered into a trial in which some would be given short-acting human insulin (1 unit/kg) or placebo once a day intranasally (inhaled) until they developed Type 1 diabetes and needed traditional injectable insulin. The children were studied for an average length of 1.8 years (range lasted from 0-9.7 years). The study ended early because the insulin did not show any benefit -- as many children on insulin as on placebo developed diabetes, over similar ranges of time from the start of the trial.

Reliability:
Almost all of the authors are either medical doctors or professors of medicine. The number of children studied was not very large (only about 260), and they had already developed diabetes-related antibodies.

Would the results have been different if insulin had been administered before antibodies had developed, with the trial endpoint being the development of antibodies? Would the results have been different if a basal insulin had been used, or a different dosage?

As far as I know there is no inhaled insulin treatment for Type 1 diabetes in people. Does inhaled insulin work as primary treatment in those of that strain of mice who have developed diabetes? If it does, then the experiment is "comparing apples and oranges", and the analogous human experiment would require injected insulin.

Practical Applications:
Had there been a reduction in the number of children studied who developed Type 1 diabetes, or a significant delay in their development of Type 1 diabetes, then inhaled insulin therapy could have been used as a preventative (prophylactic) measure. The negative findings show that it cannot be.

Ethics Note:
The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00223613. Since the subjects were likely minors, their parents would have been required to provide the necessary consent.

This synopsis was based on the abstract only.

Can metformin help Type 1 diabetics?

Effect of Adjunct Metformin Treatment in Patients with Type-1 Diabetes and Persistent Inadequate Glycaemic Control. A Randomized Study
Original source: PLoS ONE 3(10): e3363
Authors: Søren Søgaard Lund (corresponding author), Lise Tarnow, Anne Sofie Astrup, Peter Hovind, Peter Karl Jacobsen, Amra Ciric Alibegovic, Ida Parving, Lotte Pietraszek, Merete Frandsen, Peter Rossing, Hans-Henrik Parving, Allan Arthur Vaag
Publication date: October 9, 2008
DOI (digital document ID): 10.1371/journal.pone.0003363
Requires subscription? No
Publicly-available abstract: Yes

Synopsis:
Despite intensive insulin use, many people who have had Type 1 (autoimmune) diabetes for a long period of time have trouble maintaining adequate glucose control and achieving an HbA1c of under 7%, which is considered a threshold beneath which the risk of developing complications of diabetes is reduced. There are a number of reasons -- physiological (medical), environmental, and psychological -- for poor control. One of the physiological reasons may be the development of insulin resistance over time. This study looks at the potential for adding the use of metformin -- an initial drug of choice in treating Type 2 (metabolic) diabetes (which often includes insulin resistance) -- to the use of insulin to improve blood glucose control in Type 1 diabetes.

The study included 100 Type 1 diabetes patients with poorly-controlled blood glucose levels (defined as HbA1c over 8%). A one-month period in which all of them received identical placebo pills was followed by a three-week period in which the pills of half of the patients was gradually changed to include 1000 mg metformin, twice daily. The other patients continued to receive placebo pills. The patients were followed at one- to three-month intervals, for a period of a year after maximum/target dose was achieved.

The study was conducted as a double-blind study, which means that neither the investigators nor the patients knew who was taking metformin and who was not.

At each clinic visit before and during the study, patients were tested for HbA1c, c-peptide levels (a protein used as an indicator of remaining beta-cell function), and blood glucose level. Their body mass index (BMI -- a comparison of weight to height) was also measured. They were asked to estimate the average of the blood glucose measurements they took themselves at home. They were also requested to report serious adverse effects (including life-threatening events requiring hospitalization, or which resulted in persistent or significant loss of physical abilities, or which caused an adverse reaction due to a birth defect, and hypoglycemic events which resulted in unconsciousness or which required the intervention of a third party) and minor adverse effects (including hypoglycemia mild enough for the patient to be able to treat himself). They were also asked to report any changes to their insulin prescriptions and treatments (change of type of insulin, number of injections per day, sites used, and dosage).

In addition to analyzing the HbA1c measurements of the entire groups (metformin and placebo), researchers counter-checked changes in HbA1c with changes in patient weight and insulin dosage. They also analyzed the measurements from overweight and obese patients separately from those of normal weight, and the results from those taking higher amounts of insulin daily from those taking smaller amounts, since insulin resistance is often treated with higher doses of insulin; it is also associated with overweight and obesity.

The results of the analysis showed no significant changes in HbA1c level for either group. However, the metformin users lost, on average, a little more than a kilogram of body weight and were able to reduce their daily insulin usage by, on average, 0.03 units per kilogram of body weight. By comparison, those patients on placebo did not lose weight and, on average, needed to increase their insulin usage by 0.03 units per kilogram of body weight. (This corresponds to average total daily insulin use of 3 units less per day for the metformin group, and about 2.5 units more per day for the placebo group.)

The results of this study were compared to the results of previous studies, and the strengths and limitations of both this study and those were examined.

Reliability:
The authors are professionals in the fields of endocrinology and diabetes care, associated with accredited institutions. The results were published in a peer-reviewed journal.

The study size was small, so there is some potential for skew.

The use of double-blinding and placebos removed the variables of being able to attribute all good effects to the use of the drug, as well as that of all positive effects being due to the suggestion of the pills being effective.

The duration of the study was long enough to determine whether metformin would have any effect on HbA1c; however, the reduction in insulin use among the metformin patients may have counteracted the drug's effects on lowering HbA1c. The authors note that had they specified that the patients not drop their insulin dosages, there may have been a greater risk of serious hypoglycemic events.

Practical Applications:
The authors suggest that the mild weight reduction and apparent improved insulin sensitivity among the patients treated with metformin may lower these patients' diabetes-related cardiovascular risks; however, metformin does not appear to be a useful tool for improving glycemic control in patients with long-duration Type 1 diabetes.


This synopsis was based on the entire article.

Could antioxidants fight diabetes?

The role of antioxidant supplement in immune system, neoplastic, and neurodegenerative disorders: a point of view for an assessment of the risk/benefit profile
Original source: Nutrition Journal 2008, 7:29
Authors: Daria Brambilla, Cesare Mancuso, Mariagrazia Rita Scuderi, Paolo Bosco, Giuseppina Cantarella, Laurence Lempereur, Giulia Di Benedetto, Salvatore Pezzino, and Renato Bernardini (corresponding author)
Publication date: 30 September 2008
DOI (digital document ID): 10.1186/1475-2891-7-29
Requires subscription? No
Publicly-available abstract: Yes

Synopsis:
The authors discuss the use of antioxidant foods and supplements in the treatment of chronic disease. They are particularly interested in the effect of dietary antioxidants on the management of cancer and neurological and immune disorders. They are particularly interested in antioxidant enzyme systems, such as the heme oxygenase/biliverdin reductase system, which may be directly affected by the presence of antioxidants in the diet. They believe these enzyme systems may efficiently reduce oxidative damage and minimize the progression of disease-related oxidative stress. The clinical effects of dietary antioxidants is still under debate. Along the same lines, the excess consumption or bioavailability of fat-soluble vitamins has been associated with increased incidence of cancer.

The concepts of "free radicals" and "oxidative stress" are defined, and are said to damage the body's proteins, DNA, and lipids (fats). The authors mention some of the pathways in which oxidative stress occurs and can be measured, how oxidation can affect the digestive and immune systems, and how micronutrient deficiencies can cause the immune system to be depressed. This includes the discussion of methods for determining how the human body uses vitamins, minerals, and antioxidants, how chronic and autoimmune diseases may be affected by oxidative stress, and how antioxidants -- both alone and along with other chemicals -- may affect the disease process.The authors caution that the potential benefit of using antioxidants to reduce this damage must be weighed against the possible damage they might cause if overused, and that a thorough understanding of how these nutrients act chemically, in the cellular environment, and on a person as a whole.

Reliability:
The authors are associated with the pharmacology departments of their universities. The issues discussed are related to the pharmacological properties of nutrients and nutrient supplements (nutriceuticals). This is a general article; while specific diseases, oxidants, and disease pathways are mentioned, no quantitative analysis is given. The authors are optimistic about the use of antioxidants in the management of chronic illnesses, but are concerned about people blindly adding antioxidant supplements before their effects are thoroughly tested.

Practical Applications:
While neurological disorders are given particular emphasis, that the authors touch on "chronic diseases" and "autoimmune disorders" suggests that their findings may be useful in the use of dietary supplements for both Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes. Better understanding of how oxidative stress affects diabetes, and controlled experiments using particular antioxidants, are both needed both to verify whether or not this will work for most people, and to determine what specific antioxidants and combinations should be taken.

For further reading:
Check the authors' bibliography for studies relating to specific diseases.

This synopsis was based on the entire article.