Two biases of significant note: (1) current medical understanding is that at the point of T2DM diagnosis, a person has lost 50% of beta cell function (AACE, p. 16), and (2) the diabetes online community is primarily informed by persons with Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), an autoimmune disorder for which there is currently no cure.
Based on the above attitudes and biases, the belief would be that the new mother, having been diagnosed with GD during pregnancy, would be considered to have T2DM, even if it can be mediated without frank lifestyle adjustments. Similarly, the person who was diagnosed with T2DM is considered to still have T2DM, even if it is mediated completely by D&E.
Unlike most presentations of T1DM, T2DM is currently understood to be a progressive condition. Our understanding of its progression in a given individual is informed by both quantitative and qualitative benchmarks. The most common quantitative benchmarks are the individual's fasting blood glucose level, serum fructosamine level, and amount of glycosylated hemoglobin. Other quantitative benchmarks -- such as c-peptide level -- may be useful in determining both insulin resistance and degree of remaining beta cell function. Qualitative benchmarks include signs and symptoms of known complications of diabetes at all levels of their development.
One analogy for cataloguing the degree of progression of T2DM is that used for cataloguing hypertension or cancer: a stage chart. In Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC7), hypertension is categorized from consistently slightly-elevated blood pressure ("prehypertension") through progressively elevated levels, and the response of those levels to pharmacotherapy.
An initial straw man chart can be derived from the American Association of Clinical Endrocrinologists' Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice for the Management of Diabetes Mellitus (2007) examples for initial pharmacotherapy of T2DM:
| Progression Level | HbA1c (untreated) |
|---|---|
| Stage 1 (Prediabetes) | 5.7 - 6.4 |
| Stage 2 | 6.5 - 7.0 |
| Stage 3 | 7.0 - 8.0 |
| Stage 4 | 8.0 - 10.0 |
| Stage 5 | > 10.0 |
Other issues that play into determining the progression of T2DM include the deterioration of endogenous insulin production, the development of complications of diabetes, and the degree to which a person's blood glucose levels and HbA1c are responsive to pharmacotherapy. A more complex table of progression might include these in a manner such as this:
| Level | HbA1c (Goal)1 | Effective Therapy | Evidence of Complications | c-peptide (relative) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stage 1 (Pre-Diabetes)2 | < 6.03 | ILM. Oral medication optional for aggressive treatment. | none | high |
| Stage 2 | < 6.5 | Oral medication and/or insulin sensitizer required | none | high |
| Stage 3 | < 7.0 | Combination therapy and/or insulin required | possible; possible comorbid conditions | varies |
| Stage 4 | < 7.0 | Insulin therapy required, with or without oral medications and/or pramlintide (Symlin) | probable; possible comorbid conditions | low |
| Stage 5 | < 8.0 | Intensive insulin therapy required, possibly in conjunction with insulin sensitizers | obvious; one or more comorbid conditions | low |
2 Includes all previous diagnoses of gestational diabetes or Type 2 diabetes in which pharmacotherapy is not currently indicated
3 More aggressive practitioners may argue for an HbA1c goal of under 5.5 for Stage 1, under 6.0 for Stage 2, and under 6.5 for later stages of T2DM. The less-aggressive goals are informed in part by the (ACCORD) study, in which the tested combination therapy suggested a higher mortality risk for intensive control.
A classification scheme of this sort may remove the ambiguity of a diagnosis of "prediabetes" and its associated laissez-faire ("It's not diabetes") attitude, as well as the popular belief that once diagnosed, one can become "undiagnosed" (or perhaps "de-diagnosed"). It can also alert a medical practitioner to the need for ongoing monitoring and assessment of a person's glucose metabolism. On the other hand, classification will add to the pool of people indicated to have diabetes those who do not consider themselves to be currently affected by diabetes -- and in an environment where a positive diagnosis can mean the denial of employment, medical insurance, or healthcare, this can have worse repercussions than living with undiagnosed or untreated Stage 1 (or even Stage 2) T2DM.

